Log in

02 April 2010 @ 06:54 pm
Rolling Stone scans!  

( click to enlarge )

If you'd like untagged copies to use for graphics, just drop me a comment. :)
Carogleeful_beat on April 2nd, 2010 10:59 pm (UTC)
I bought three copies of this for myself today, and I thought about scanning it, but I was too lazy to figure out the scanner at work.

Props to you. I'm sure lots of people will be appreciative of this, especially non-US Gleeks.
Disney Princessadventures on April 2nd, 2010 11:02 pm (UTC)
Crap I really want the picture of Artie, Tina, and Mercedes but I don't want to buy this. Eh, I'll just print one out from online.
Lindsay: | Dianna Agrondriftingaway on April 2nd, 2010 11:05 pm (UTC)
May I have the first two that is under the cut untagged for graphics? :)
recklessinsanity: p&q | let's give us a chancesarzworld on April 2nd, 2010 11:09 pm (UTC)
thank you so much for this. :D
tambourinelove on April 2nd, 2010 11:14 pm (UTC)
What a terrible article! It's cool they got the cover of Rolling Stone and everything, but that interviewer is a dick.
rabemesses on April 2nd, 2010 11:23 pm (UTC)
so rude :/
alliedempsie on April 2nd, 2010 11:24 pm (UTC)
ugh this is the worst article, like ever. D:

the pictures are pretty though :)
eliz: tv: glee: your resentment is deliciousends_and_means on April 2nd, 2010 11:26 pm (UTC)
Is the person who wrote this article 17? What an immature, ridiculous piece. Not even entertaining.
Jane, you ignorant slutlos_york on April 2nd, 2010 11:31 pm (UTC)
Novak: because they are coolnovak_fan on April 3rd, 2010 03:43 am (UTC)
I thought the same when I saw the Glee one
jaymcbjaymcb on April 2nd, 2010 11:34 pm (UTC)
Now I am wondering if Lea's ass on the cover is a homage to the interviewer?
27_seconds27_seconds on April 2nd, 2010 11:47 pm (UTC)
my thought exactly!

Edited at 2010-04-02 11:47 pm (UTC)
cheriamor_0316cheriamor_0316 on April 2nd, 2010 11:38 pm (UTC)
The article was poorly written, but... I don't find the questions offensive at all. They were joke questions meant to be responded by a smartass answer. I don't get why you would cry over them. Lea's "I have perfect pitch" statement bugs me. Even if you are the best, you don't say it because it can come off as snobby. Chris did the best with the interview it seems. I think he is very entertaining. Jane got a little crazy. They aren't kids... they are in their 20's. So overall, the interview was blah... but the pictures are great!
Rachhippiebanana132 on April 3rd, 2010 12:34 am (UTC)
They might not be kids, but many of them are still pretty new to this process. And however old they are, they still human beings who deserve to be treated with some respect and not slagged off after every word they say, no matter how hard they try.
(no subject) - cheriamor_0316 on April 3rd, 2010 01:49 am (UTC) (Expand)
(no subject) - hippiebanana132 on April 3rd, 2010 08:09 pm (UTC) (Expand)
(no subject) - keepsmilinglee on April 3rd, 2010 01:05 am (UTC) (Expand)
(no subject) - lovelycudy on April 3rd, 2010 01:40 am (UTC) (Expand)
(no subject) - cammiel on April 3rd, 2010 02:20 pm (UTC) (Expand)
(no subject) - lovelycudy on April 3rd, 2010 05:58 pm (UTC) (Expand)
(no subject) - cammiel on April 3rd, 2010 06:02 pm (UTC) (Expand)
(no subject) - lovelycudy on April 3rd, 2010 06:09 pm (UTC) (Expand)
(no subject) - cammiel on April 3rd, 2010 06:12 pm (UTC) (Expand)
(no subject) - lovelycudy on April 3rd, 2010 06:23 pm (UTC) (Expand)
(no subject) - lady_maethoriel on April 3rd, 2010 02:10 am (UTC) (Expand)
(no subject) - latexana on April 3rd, 2010 03:27 am (UTC) (Expand)
Carolineahigheroctave on April 2nd, 2010 11:39 pm (UTC)
That Chris part made me a little misty. I just want to hug him to pieces.

Although, I don't see why peeing in the shower is such a taboo question for them. And they kind of make Dianna and Lea out as bitchs. Grrr...
(Deleted comment)
(no subject) - cheriamor_0316 on April 3rd, 2010 01:51 am (UTC) (Expand)
niblettkniblettk on April 2nd, 2010 11:43 pm (UTC)
Okay, so even though I sort of admire the writing style and his word choices (besides either not knowing what a Ukelele is or not being funny with his "ook-a-lay-lay" thing), the article is rude and it seems like this guy went into the interviews expecting to hate these actors.

I feel so bad for the cast, having to sit through this garbage. Serious props to Jane though, for calling him out on it.
stellarsciencestellarscience on April 4th, 2010 09:13 am (UTC)
I agree with you. There's a difference between joking around and being rude. And the guy obviously didn't know it.
(Deleted comment)
Rachhippiebanana132 on April 3rd, 2010 12:32 am (UTC)
anyone got a number so i can call them up and tell them to entertain me, cause that article did not. - Haha, win.
TCtagalongcookies on April 2nd, 2010 11:48 pm (UTC)
Jeez! Bitter much, writer? Thanks for the scans though--I might have accidentally bought the mag otherwise!
jaymcbjaymcb on April 2nd, 2010 11:54 pm (UTC)
First I think the guy was exaggerating about them "crying" over the question. Second this is bothering me _ Perfect pitch - Perfect Pitch is the ability of a person to be able to identify a specific note without reference to any previously sounded note. It really has nothing to so with ability to sing as much as to id notes. So don't see it as bragging just a piece of trivia.

Why didn't the guy ask Cory what he wore to bed?

I don't see why peeing in the show is a taboo question, just a stupid one.

So the cast did what they could answered what they wanted and moved on.
Astuta: No no Kurtastuta on April 2nd, 2010 11:57 pm (UTC)
I'm glad this lousy writer was nice to Chris, otherwise I would be royally pissed. Not that how I feel about it matters at all, but still.

What a first class a**hole.
Morgan D.morgan_d on April 3rd, 2010 02:16 am (UTC)
Well, it seemed kinda typical of RS to me, to be honest. I was a bit torn about the whole idea of Glee on RS. Well, mainly, I was afraid for Chris (because, we agree on that, he's all that matters ^_~). I was afraid they might trash him. Then I was afraid they might label him an unimportant co-star and not interview him at all. (Apparently, that almost happened!) Then I was afraid that they would interview him and not trash him, but would somehow fail to add anything new to all we already know about him. (I love him to pieces, but he always says the same things. Sometimes in the exact same words. Which is perfectly understandable, since the cast is interviewed over and over by people who always ask the same darn questions, but it does get annoying after a while.)

It seems I got door number 3.

I find it hilarious (and very telling) that they couldn't cross the line with Chris. It just wouldn't work, because the strategy was doing the interview as high school bullies, and there comes Chris saying, "Yeah, I remember the bullies, but look who's laughing now."

It was a poor strategy, and in the end they tried to salvage what they could from the very little they accomplished. The result is disappointing, even considering it's RS.

For all the attention this cast gets, they've met very few good interviewers so far...
(no subject) - lovelycudy on April 3rd, 2010 03:59 am (UTC) (Expand)
More like redumkulous, amirite amirite?redikolous on April 2nd, 2010 11:57 pm (UTC)
Lord man, this article is terribad. Just ridiculous.
(Deleted comment)
aydenheadswedance on April 3rd, 2010 12:35 am (UTC)
This is why I love you.
(no subject) - adventures on April 3rd, 2010 12:48 am (UTC) (Expand)
(Deleted comment)
(no subject) - redikolous on April 3rd, 2010 01:04 am (UTC) (Expand)
(no subject) - jaymcb on April 3rd, 2010 01:22 am (UTC) (Expand)
briasoleil: team finn - Kudos to anaklazarobriasoleil on April 3rd, 2010 12:12 am (UTC)
Wow. That's an incredibly awful article. Surprisingly, gobsmackingly awful article. I mean, what was the interviewer's angle? To discover how unwholesome the seemingly wholesome Glee kids are? Who asks questions like "do you pee in the shower?" or "do you wear a thong?"? That's not journalism. That's just fetishism. Or some other weird shit. What does it matter if Dianna kisses girls or Lea wears thongs? And whose business is that anyway? Why not ask things that are pertinent or interesting or relevant or simply not creepy?

Because I'm quite fond of Cory, I've generally followed him the most, read or watched his interviews, etc. And when Jian and George interviewed him, he was forthright and honest about his past - no, he didn't mention criminal activity or anything - but still, it couldn't have been easy, but he wasn't conning them (or, so it would seem). Why go off and paint Cory as a current con artist of sorts?

I really just don't get it. It makes me really sad that they were put through this experience just so some interviewer can get his rocks off.
Rachhippiebanana132 on April 3rd, 2010 12:31 am (UTC)
That's not journalism. - This, so much. This whole thing was so immature and unprofessional. If I were in control of that magazine, I wouldn't even print this rubbish. I've never read RS before, but if this had been a great article I probably would have started buying it. Great marketing strategies there, RS. You've probably just lost yourself a whole bunch of potential readers.
(no subject) - ends_and_means on April 3rd, 2010 01:29 am (UTC) (Expand)
mlo1114: i believemlo1114 on April 3rd, 2010 12:19 am (UTC)
I'd love some untagged copies of the images for graphics.
I so needed this!

Rachhippiebanana132 on April 3rd, 2010 12:28 am (UTC)
This is genuinely the worst interview I have ever read, and so full of double standards. They want and expect the cast to act all "high school" and then actually get offended when the cast responds in a way RS deems to be "high school" in response to their own immature questions? And I'm sorry, RS reporter, do you want us to feel bad about your own "misty eyes" and hurt feelings when you have spent about six pages insulting a cast we all love and have bought your magazine to read about?

There are more things to life than being bad, horrible people. Stop digging, stop inventing dirt, and grow up and do your job properly. No interviewer should ever sit there and write, "But we don't care" about something their interviewee has said. This could have been a great article with what those cast members gave, but this interviewer ruined it.

Good for you, Jane Lynch. I actually just cheered for you.
☆チャーリーちゃん☆: Glee-PENIScharlie_chan on April 3rd, 2010 01:36 am (UTC)
I totally and fully agree with you.

uug.. just thinking of that interview really gives me a bad taste in my mouth -__-
aydenheadswedance on April 3rd, 2010 12:34 am (UTC)
It's Rolling Stone, the interviewers are snarky assholes. Read any other Rolling Stone article and you will understand that. I loved it, though I did think Jane would be a little more open to those kinds of questions.

Cory and Lea, never change.
(Deleted comment)
cheriamor_0316cheriamor_0316 on April 3rd, 2010 01:57 am (UTC)
I think it was kind of like a test. How would these new, young actors act to these off the wall questions. In all honesty, the way you hadle stuff like that shows a lot about you. I do wish that instead of being offended they would've just been witty or sarcastic and played along. The article would've been much more fun. I did learn stuff about them though. Glad it wasn't all "how did you get into acting" and "is this your first role".
(Deleted comment)
tea_biscuittea_biscuit on April 5th, 2010 12:50 pm (UTC)
THANK YOU!!! I was really irritated by his account of being molested at EIGHT YEARS OLD by a SIXTEEN-YEAR-OLD football player. It was like he was glamorizing his life a bit. I was ALWAYS and oddball I KINDA WANTED it. I felt like LOLITA. Oh for the love of - Arrrgh! I kind of see - KIND OF- what he means - BUT imagine what those who were traumatized by such incidents in their life would think/feel upon reading this. Maybe I'm going overboard, but I felt like Ryan - as much I respect him - really hit the wrong note here >_
(no subject) - tea_biscuit on April 5th, 2010 12:55 pm (UTC) (Expand)